Global Fertility Collapse

The Age of Depopulation With Nicholas Eberstadt - YouTube

Scientists Investigate Multiple Causes Behind Historic Population Decline

Research points to environmental toxins, air pollution, microplastics, and cultural shifts as humanity faces first voluntary depopulation since the involuntary purge of the medieval plague

For the first time since the Black Death, global population is poised to decline—but unlike the 14th century pandemic, today's crisis stems from plummeting birth rates rather than mass mortality. Researchers worldwide are investigating an array of potential causes, from endocrine-disrupting chemicals to fundamental shifts in human values, with mounting evidence that environmental contamination may play a larger role than previously understood.

The Scale of the Decline

Fertility rates have fallen below the 2.1 replacement level across every continent except sub-Saharan Africa, according to United Nations Population Division data. East Asia shows the steepest declines, with South Korea's 2023 fertility rate hitting 0.72—the lowest ever recorded for a major nation.

China's population has shrunk for multiple consecutive years, with projections showing the next generation could be only half the size of the current one. Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan all experienced population declines by 2022, with East Asian fertility rates approximately 50% below replacement levels.

Europe has maintained sub-replacement fertility for half a century, and Russia has recorded 17 million more deaths than births since the Soviet Union's fall, while France registered fewer births in 2023 than in 1806, the year Napoleon won the Battle of Jena.

Investigating Root Causes

The PFAS Connection: New Evidence of Environmental Impact

While contraception and cultural factors have dominated demographic discussions, emerging research reveals a potentially significant environmental dimension to the fertility crisis. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)—synthetic chemicals used since the 1940s in countless consumer products—are now under intense scrutiny for their reproductive impacts.

A 2023 Mount Sinai study found that exposure to PFAS may reduce fertility in women by as much as 40%, with higher blood concentrations associated with significant reductions in pregnancy and live birth likelihood among women trying to conceive.

Research from Singapore's preconception cohort showed 30-40% lower odds of clinical pregnancy and live birth for every quartile increase in PFAS mixture exposure, with perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA) identified as the strongest contributor.

The ubiquity of exposure is staggering. CDC data shows PFAS are detectable in the blood of 97% of Americans, despite blood levels of legacy PFAS like PFOS declining by over 85% and PFOA by over 70% since production phase-outs began in 2002.

Most critically, a Minnesota study provided the first epidemiological evidence of causation: when Oakdale installed water filtration to remove PFAS in 2006, the general fertility rate—which had been 15-25% lower than control communities—began recovering, demonstrating that elevated PFAS exposure directly affects population-level fertility.

Air Pollution: A Global Reproductive Threat

Air pollution emerges as another significant environmental factor correlating with reduced fertility across multiple studies. A Barcelona study found statistically significant reductions in fertility rates with increased traffic-related air pollution, particularly for coarse particulate matter, representing the first human study showing association between reduced fertility and higher air pollution levels.

Systematic reviews found that in IVF populations, nitrogen dioxide and ozone were associated with reduced live birth rates, while particulate matter of 10 micrometers was associated with increased miscarriage. In general populations, PM2.5 and PM10 were associated with reduced fecundability, while sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen dioxide might promote miscarriage and stillbirths.

A 2025 study of over 13,000 assisted reproductive technology patients in China found that PM2.5 exposure led to decreased success rates of pregnancy and live births, with live birth rates exhibiting notable decline in winter compared to other seasons.

The mechanisms are multiple. Research on ovarian reserve parameters found associations between air pollution exposure and diminished egg quality, with chronic exposure to sulfur dioxide associated with lower antral follicle count, and PM2.5 linked to reduced Anti-Müllerian hormone levels.

For males, a retrospective cohort study of over 21,000 men found significant associations between chronic low-level environmental exposure to endocrine-disrupting compound air pollution from industrial sources and decreased semen parameters, with strongest associations for increased odds of azoospermia and declines in total motility and volume.

Beyond physiological impacts, air pollution even affects fertility intentions: a 2023 Chinese study found that a one standard deviation increase in the daily Air Quality Index over three months decreased immediate fertility intention by 0.75 standard deviations, with young women in more polluted areas showing higher reductions.

Declining Sperm Quality and Male Fertility

Independent of contraceptive use, male reproductive health has deteriorated dramatically. A 2022 meta-analysis in Human Reproduction Update found sperm counts among Western men have declined more than 50% since 1973, with acceleration after 2000.

Dr. Shanna Swan of Mount Sinai projects that if current trends continue, median sperm counts could theoretically reach zero by 2045. Her research links declining sperm quality to phthalates and endocrine-disrupting chemicals in plastics, personal care products, and food packaging, which interfere with hormone production during critical fetal development windows.

A 2023 study in Environmental Health Perspectives detected microplastics in every human testicular sample examined, with correlations between microplastic concentrations and reduced sperm production.

Environmental Endocrine Disruptors

The Endocrine Society's 2020 scientific statement identified over 1,000 chemicals with endocrine-disrupting properties now widespread in the environment, including phthalates in plastics, BPA in food packaging, PFAS in non-stick cookware, pesticides, and flame retardants in furniture.

Research in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology estimated endocrine disruptors contribute to over €150 billion annually in health costs across Europe, including impacts on reproductive health.

A comprehensive 2025 analysis estimated that PFOA exposure alone contributed to approximately 461,635 cases of low birth weight annually over the past two decades, with the majority occurring in Asian regions.

Female Fertility Impacts Beyond Contraception

Research documented earlier onset of menopause among women with higher PFAS exposure, along with increased rates of polycystic ovary syndrome, endometriosis prevalence doubling since the 1990s, and pregnancy complications including miscarriage.

Studies examining pregnant women in contaminated areas found that PFAS exposure during pregnancy was associated with lower birth weight, reduced gestational age, increased odds of preterm birth, and significantly lower general fertility rates in affected populations.

Contraceptive Access and Changing Preferences

The contraceptive revolution beginning in the 1960s provided unprecedented reproductive control. However, demographers note this alone cannot explain current trends—birth rates continue falling in countries where contraception has been widely available for decades.

Research shows an almost one-to-one correspondence between national fertility rates and the number of children women say they want to have, suggesting changing desires rather than access barriers drive the decline.

Economic and Social Factors

Multiple economic pressures compound the crisis. A 2023 Federal Reserve Bank of New York analysis found each 10% increase in home prices correlates with 1.5% decline in millennial birth rates. Brookings Institution research showed Americans with student loans delay childbearing by 3-4 years and have 15% fewer children overall.

The U.S. Treasury Department reported childcare costs now exceed in-state college tuition in 33 states. A 2024 Pew Research study found 64% of childless adults aged 18-49 cited "wanting to focus on career" as a major reason, up from 48% in 2018.

Cultural and Philosophical Shifts

Demographer Nicholas Eberstadt identified what he calls modern society's prioritization of "autonomy, self-actualization, and convenience"—qualities fundamentally at odds with childrearing—as central to understanding why even affluent populations choose smaller families.

Dr. Jennifer Johnson Hanks at UC Berkeley argues modern culture increasingly frames children as impediments to self-actualization rather than sources of meaning. Social media's role remains debated, with a 2024 University of Pennsylvania study finding correlation between Instagram use and lowered childbearing intentions.

Mimetic Theory and Social Contagion

René Girard's mimetic theory suggests humans learn desires through social imitation, proposing that small family norms become self-reinforcing as fewer people observe multi-child households. The theory may explain why secular Jews in Israel maintain above-replacement fertility while secular American Jews fall far below, suggesting social context matters more than individual calculation.

The Puzzling Exception: Sub-Saharan Africa

Sub-Saharan Africa remains the sole continent above replacement fertility at 4.3 births per woman, though declining from 6.5 in the 1960s. Yet paradoxically, the region faces substantial environmental health challenges that elsewhere correlate with fertility decline.

Africa's Air Pollution Paradox

The average annual PM2.5 concentration in sub-Saharan Africa in 2019 was 45 μg/m³—far exceeding WHO's guideline of 10 μg/m³. Ghana, Ethiopia, and Rwanda all experienced mean PM2.5 concentrations considerably higher than international standards.

Air pollution is the third largest risk factor for deaths in children under age 5 in sub-Saharan Africa (after malnutrition and water/sanitation issues) and the second leading cause of death after malnutrition in the region.

Research indicates that ambient air pollution in sub-Saharan African cities is high compared with international standards, though continuous air quality monitoring hardly occurs in the region.

Why Fertility Remains High Despite Environmental Challenges

The persistence of high fertility in sub-Saharan Africa despite environmental pollution highlights that cultural and structural factors can override biological impediments that reduce fertility elsewhere.

Research identifies the primary cause of sub-Saharan Africa's high fertility in its social and family patterns, including cultural precepts that many descendants must be produced to ensure lineage survival, the equation of female virtue with producing large numbers of children, stronger influence of lineage over nuclear family, and belief in ancestral spirits' power.

In Burundi, Kenya, Malawi, Rwanda and Zimbabwe, the ideal family size is 3.5 to 4 children. In Chad, Democratic Republic of Congo, Mali, Niger and Nigeria, the ideal family size exceeds six children. Children are seen as important contributors to household livelihoods and carers of parents in old age.

Contraceptive prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa increased from only 13% in 1990 to 29% in 2019, still among the lowest in the world. At least 25% of married women have an unmet need for modern contraception.

Multiple barriers contribute to high fertility: political instability, poverty, lack of government commitment to female education, weak healthcare systems, and cultural beliefs viewing children as sources of income. In almost all African countries, early marriage remains common.

Women's economic empowerment correlates with reduced desired family size, but women's generally subordinate status relative to men means less control over reproduction, with men most often deciding fertility matters.

The Transition Ahead

While fertility in sub-Saharan Africa remains high, signs of change are emerging. Between 2010 and 2019, the 10 countries with the largest increases in modern contraception use were all in sub-Saharan Africa.

The region illustrates that fertility decline requires not merely the absence of environmental toxins, but fundamental shifts in cultural values, women's empowerment, access to contraception, and economic structures—factors that took generations to transform in now-low-fertility societies.

The Emerging Geopolitical Order

Africa's Demographic Dividend—or Challenge

By 2050, the UN projects Africa will account for 25% of global population versus 13% in 2000, with the population tripling from 1.3 billion to potentially 4.3 billion by 2100.

However, educational challenges threaten to limit Africa's demographic dividend. Research by Hoover Institution scholar Erik Hanushek suggests over 90% of the rising generation in sub-Saharan Africa lacks basic rudimentary skills measured in international assessments, potentially preventing African workers from filling labor shortages in aging economies.

Asia's Demographic Cliff

China's working-age population has peaked and is projected to shrink by 200 million by 2050, while South Korea faces population decline from 51 million to 24 million by 2100 at current rates. After China adjusted its one-child policy in 2016, births dropped by about half rather than increasing.

Europe's Twilight

European populations are shrinking in 19 of 27 EU nations, with Romania, Bulgaria, and the Baltic states facing 20-30% population losses by mid-century absent immigration surges. The 27 countries of the European Union reported just under 3.7 million births in 2023, down from 6.8 million in 1964.

American Exceptionalism—Fading?

The United States maintained above-replacement fertility until 2007 but has since fallen 20% below replacement level. For the past 15 years, U.S. fertility has remained below the threshold needed for population stability, with Census Bureau projections showing potential population peak within 30-40 years even with continued immigration.

Failed Policy Interventions

Government attempts to boost birth rates have proven largely ineffective. Hungary offers up to $35,000 in subsidies and tax breaks for three-child families, yet birth rates rose only modestly from 1.23 to 1.59—still far below replacement. Sweden's generous 16-month paid leave correlates with 1.67 fertility, while France's extensive childcare system supports the EU's highest fertility of 1.84, both remaining below replacement.

Research shows pro-natalist policies may shift birth timing but rarely increase completed family size substantially, with a "Swedish roller coaster" pattern of temporary spikes followed by declines below baseline.

Toward a New World Order

The demographic transition reshapes global power. The coalescing partnership among China, Iran, North Korea and Russia faces unfavorable demographic tides, with China's birth crash set to halve its next generation. However, even a shrinking revisionist power can cause outsized international trouble, particularly when possessing the world's second-largest economy.

The United States remains demographically exceptional among affluent democracies due to relatively higher birth levels and immigration acceptance, though both advantages are eroding. Continued openness to immigration will determine whether America maintains its demographic edge.

The Path Forward

Dr. Swan argues for aggressive regulation of endocrine disruptors, warning that "if we don't act, we're looking at a future where most couples will need reproductive assistance to have children." The Minnesota filtration study demonstrates that reducing environmental PFAS exposure can restore fertility rates, while emerging air quality research suggests similar interventions could help reverse trends.

Sub-Saharan Africa's example proves that environmental contamination alone does not determine fertility outcomes—cultural values, women's empowerment, and economic structures matter profoundly. This suggests fertility restoration in developed nations requires not merely cleaner environments, but perhaps cultural renewal valuing family formation.

Yet the crisis extends beyond chemistry to meaning itself. "There have never been so many people on earth as there are now, and there's so much loneliness," observes demographer Nicholas Eberstadt, suggesting material abundance proves inadequate for human flourishing. The demographic collapse may signal a civilization substituting convenience for continuity, choosing individual autonomy over generational legacy.

Whether populations stabilize at lower levels, continue shrinking, or eventually rebound depends on variables from chemical regulation to cultural renewal—dynamics humanity is only beginning to understand.

---

Sources

1. "Uncommon Knowledge: The Depopulation Bomb with Nicholas Eberstadt." Hoover Institution, 2025. [Video interview transcript]

2. Mount Sinai Health System. (March 17, 2023). "Exposure to Chemicals Found in Everyday Products Is Linked to Significantly Reduced Fertility." https://www.mountsinai.org/about/newsroom/2023/exposure-to-chemicals-found-in-everyday-products-is-linked-to-significantly-reduced-fertility

3. Swan, S.H. & Colino, S. (2021). Count Down: How Our Modern World Is Threatening Sperm Counts. Scribner.

4. Gore, A.C., et al. (2020). "EDC-2: The Endocrine Society's Second Scientific Statement on Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals." Endocrine Reviews, 41(1): 1-150. https://academic.oup.com/edrv/article/41/1/1/5614597

5. Zhao, H., et al. (2023). "Microplastic presence in human testicular tissue." Environmental Health Perspectives, 131(6). https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov

6. Cohen, N.J., et al. (2023). "Exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances and women's fertility outcomes." Science of The Total Environment, 873: 162267.

7. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. "PFAS Exposure Linked to Reduced Fertility in Women." https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/supported/centers/core/spotlight/fertility

8. Waterfield, G., et al. (2020). "Reducing exposure to high levels of perfluorinated compounds in drinking water improves reproductive outcomes." Environmental Health, 19(42). https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-020-00591-0

9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (November 7, 2024). "Fast Facts: PFAS in the U.S. Population." https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/data-research/facts-stats/index.html

10. Ding, N., et al. (2024). "Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances and Age at Natural Menopause." JAMA Network Open, 7(1): e2352426.

11. Attina, T.M., et al. (2023). "Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the USA." The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 11(5): 345-357.

12. Environmental Working Group. (March 2024). "PFAS and Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity." https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/2024/03/pfas-and-developmental-and-reproductive-toxicity-ewg-fact-sheet

13. Fan, Y., et al. (2025). "An insight into the environmental and human health impacts of PFAS." Environmental Sciences Europe, 37(61). https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-025-01122-9

14. Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J., et al. (2014). "Air pollution and human fertility rates." Environment International, 70: 9-14. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160412014001470

15. Conforti, A., et al. (2018). "Air pollution and female fertility: a systematic review." Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 16(1): 117. https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-017-0291-8

16. BMC Public Health. (April 11, 2025). "Environmental pollution and human fertility: investigating the relationship between PM2.5 exposure and assisted reproductive technology outcomes." https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-025-22518-5

17. Gaskins, A.J., et al. (2024). "Exposure to air pollution and ovarian reserve parameters." Scientific Reports, 14. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-50753-6

18. Ramsay, J.M., et al. (2023). "Environmental exposure to industrial air pollution is associated with decreased male fertility." Fertility and Sterility, 120(3): 637-647.

19. Liao, J., et al. (2023). "Preventing a new baby: Impact of air pollution on fertility intention." Economic Analysis and Policy, 80: 1138-1152.

20. Landrigan, P.J., et al. (2021). "Air pollution and development in Africa." The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(10): e681-e688. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(21)00201-1/fulltext

21. State of Global Air. "Air Pollution and Health Impacts in Africa." https://www.stateofglobalair.org/resources/africa

22. Egondi, T., et al. (2019). "Ambient air pollution and health in Sub-Saharan Africa." Environmental Research, 173: 174-188.

23. Greenpeace Africa. "Clearing the Air: Africa's Major Air Polluters Revealed." https://www.greenpeace.org/africa/en/blog/55246/clearing-the-air-africas-major-air-polluters-revealed/

24. World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa. "Air Pollution." https://www.afro.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution

25. Caldwell, J.C. & Caldwell, P. (1987). "The cultural context of high fertility in sub-Saharan Africa." Population and Development Review, 13(3): 409-437.

26. Newsweek. (July 26, 2025). "Map Shows Region Leading 2050 Global Population Increase." https://www.newsweek.com/map-global-population-increase-sub-saharan-africa-population-birth-rate-fertility-rate-2103515

27. Population Connection. (November 29, 2021). "Population Growth & High Fertility in Sub-Saharan Africa." https://populationconnection.org/blog/high-fertility-sub-saharan-africa/

28. Bongaarts, J. (2020). "Trends in fertility and fertility preferences in sub-Saharan Africa." Genus, 76: 24. https://genus.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41118-020-00098-z

29. Tesfay, F., et al. (2023). "The pooled estimate of the total fertility rate in sub-Saharan Africa." BMC Public Health, 23: 252.

30. Wusu, O. & Isiugo-Abanihe, U.C. (2019). "Women's empowerment and fertility preferences in high fertility countries in Sub-Saharan Africa." BMC Women's Health, 19: 63. https://bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12905-019-0747-9

31. Casterline, J.B. (2023). "Traditional supports and contemporary disrupters of high fertility desires in sub-Saharan Africa." Reproductive Health, 20: 93. https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12978-023-01627-7

32. Bongaarts, J. (2013). "Fertility Transition: Is sub-Saharan Africa Different?" Population and Development Review, 38(Suppl 1): 153-168.

33. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2024). "World Population Prospects 2024." https://population.un.org/wpp/

34. Eberstadt, N. (2024). "The Age of Depopulation." Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/world/age-depopulation-nicholas-eberstadt