The Antikythera Mechanism

Astronomers Cracked the Code of the Antikythera Mechanism - YouTube

Video Errors/Inaccuracies:

• The 2021 study was by UCL team led by Freeth, not about manufacturing errors
• The 2025 manufacturing error study was by Argentinian scientists (Szigety and Arenas), not Tony Freeth
• Tony Freeth actually supports the mechanism's functionality, contrary to the transcript's ending

---

Ancient Greece's Cosmic Calculator Yields New Secrets

Advanced imaging techniques borrowed from gravitational wave astronomy reveal the precision of humanity's oldest known analog computer

In the spring of 1900, Greek sponge divers seeking shelter from a Mediterranean storm discovered what would become one of archaeology's most enigmatic treasures. Beneath the waves near the island of Antikythera, between Crete and mainland Greece, lay the wreckage of a Roman-era merchant vessel that had sunk around 60 BCE. Among the cargo of marble statues, bronze figurines, and fine glassware, the divers recovered a corroded lump of bronze no larger than a shoebox. Within that unassuming mass lay the remains of the Antikythera Mechanism—a technological marvel that would challenge our understanding of ancient Greek engineering for more than a century.

The mechanism, now fragmented into 82 pieces with only 30 bronze gears surviving, functioned as a sophisticated astronomical calculator that tracked celestial movements with unprecedented accuracy for its era. The device dates to between 200 and 60 BCE, though the exact construction date remains uncertain.

A Cosmic Computer Revealed

The mechanism calculated the ecliptic longitudes of the Moon, Sun, and planets; tracked the phase and age of the Moon; predicted the synodic phases of planets; managed the excluded days of the Metonic Calendar; forecast eclipses with details about their timing and characteristics; and even tracked the Olympiad cycle. Using a complex system of interlocking gears, the device reflected ancient Greek geocentric cosmology, combining cycles from Babylonian astronomy with mathematics from Plato's Academy.

The front of the mechanism featured rotating, bejeweled hands that depicted planetary motion, operated by winding a knob or handle on its side. On the rear, two large spiral dials decorated the mechanism: one predicted eclipses using a Babylonian-based 223-month lunar cycle, while another tracked a 19-year cycle of the moon's phases.

Modern Physics Unlocks Ancient Mysteries

The latest breakthrough in understanding the Antikythera Mechanism came from an unexpected quarter: gravitational wave astronomy. In 2024, researchers Graham Woan and Joseph Bayley from the University of Glasgow applied statistical modeling techniques originally developed to analyze ripples in spacetime detected by gravitational wave observatories to resolve a long-standing puzzle about the mechanism's calendar ring.

The calendar ring, broken and incomplete, contained regularly spaced holes whose total number had remained uncertain. Initial analysis by Antikythera researcher Chris Budiselic and colleagues suggested the count fell somewhere between 347 and 367 holes. Budiselic, a machinist and YouTuber who runs the Clickspring channel, had been building his own replica of the mechanism when he encountered this problem.

Woan, intrigued by Budiselic's conundrum during the Christmas holidays, applied Bayesian analysis—a statistical method that uses probability to quantify uncertainty based on incomplete information. His colleague Bayley then adapted techniques normally used to analyze signals from LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory), which detects gravitational waves from cosmic events like black hole collisions.

Their dual analysis, published in the Horological Journal in July 2024, concluded that the ring vastly more likely contained 354 holes—corresponding to the Greek lunar calendar—than 365 holes for an Egyptian solar calendar. The probability of 354 holes proved hundreds of times greater than the previously suggested 360-hole configuration.

Extraordinary Ancient Precision

The statistical analysis revealed that the holes were positioned with extraordinary accuracy, showing an average radial variation of just 0.028 millimeters between each hole. "The precision of the holes' positioning would have required highly accurate measurement techniques and an incredibly steady hand to punch them," noted Bayley.

This level of craftsmanship speaks to sophisticated engineering capabilities in the ancient world. The quality and complexity of the mechanism's manufacture suggests it must have had undiscovered predecessors during the Hellenistic period, as machines with similar complexity did not appear again until the 14th century in Western Europe.

Ongoing Debates and New Challenges

In March 2021, the UCL Antikythera Research Team led by Tony Freeth published a comprehensive model showing how the mechanism's front gears worked together, proposing that it represented "a creation of genius—combining cycles from Babylonian astronomy, mathematics from Plato's Academy and ancient Greek astronomical theories."

However, the mechanism continues to spark scientific debate. In 2025, a team of Argentinian scientists submitted research suggesting that manufacturing errors in the original mechanism's triangular gear teeth may have been too great for the device to function reliably over extended periods. Their simulation incorporated structural inaccuracies and the device's distinctive triangle-shaped gear teeth, concluding that imperfections could have caused jamming.

Tony Freeth and other leading scholars have challenged these conclusions, noting that their models incorporating the pin-and-slot mechanism show deviations far smaller than the catastrophic failures predicted by the 2025 study. The researchers themselves emphasized that the scans they used could be incorrect about the extent of imperfections.

Archaeological Developments

The 2024 expedition to the Antikythera shipwreck, conducted between May 17 and June 20 under the leadership of the Swiss Archaeological School in Greece and the Ephorate of Marine Antiquities, yielded remarkable new discoveries. The team recovered approximately 300 objects including substantial parts of the ship's hull and evidence suggesting that multiple ships may have wrecked at the site.

Origins and Purpose

Research suggests the mechanism may have originated in the colonies of Corinth, possibly Syracuse—home of the legendary mathematician Archimedes. While some speculate Archimedes himself may have invented the concept, the surviving mechanism was constructed well after his death in 212 BCE.

The device likely served as a philosophical and educational tool, mechanizing the predictions of scientific theories and potentially automating many calculations needed for its own design—representing the first steps toward the mechanization of mathematics and science. The inscriptions on the mechanism were designed for general comprehension, not just expert use, suggesting it functioned as a teaching instrument that consolidated contemporary astronomical knowledge.

Legacy and Significance

The Antikythera Mechanism fundamentally altered our perception of ancient Greek technological capabilities. It stands as the first known device that mechanized scientific predictions, challenging all preconceptions about the technological capabilities of the ancient Greeks.

"It's a neat symmetry that we've adapted techniques we use to study the universe today to understand more about a mechanism that helped people keep track of the heavens nearly two millennia ago," reflected Woan. As research continues, each new revelation deepens our appreciation for this ancient wonder—and raises fresh questions about what other technological marvels may have been lost to history.

The bronze device reminds us that human ingenuity has ancient roots, and that our ancestors' understanding of the cosmos was far more sophisticated than previously imagined. Whether other similar mechanisms lie undiscovered on Mediterranean seabeds or were melted down for their valuable bronze centuries ago remains one of archaeology's tantalizing mysteries.

Sidebar: Crafting the Cosmos—Manufacturing Techniques and the Shipwreck

Bronze Age Precision

The Antikythera Mechanism's calendar ring demonstrates remarkable craftsmanship, with holes positioned at an average radial variation of just 0.028 millimeters—roughly one-third the width of a human hair. This level of precision, achieved more than 2,000 years ago, raises intriguing questions about ancient manufacturing techniques.

The device was constructed entirely from bronze, a copper-tin alloy that was both valuable and workable with period tools. The mechanism originally contained more than 30 interlocking bronze gears with distinctive triangular teeth, housed in a wooden case similar in size to a mantel clock. The gears employed sophisticated engineering concepts including epicyclic gearing—where gears rotate around other gears—and a pin-and-slot mechanism to model the Moon's irregular orbital motion.

Contemporary evidence suggests ancient Greek craftsmen possessed advanced metalworking capabilities. The precision required to create the mechanism's components would have demanded accurate measurement tools, steady hands, and deep understanding of both astronomy and mechanical engineering. Whether the mechanism represented an isolated burst of genius or part of a longer engineering tradition passed from master to apprentice remains uncertain.

The Fatal Voyage

The Antikythera Mechanism traveled aboard a merchant ship laden with fine bronze and marble sculptures, glassware, and luxury goods that sank within a few years after 70 BCE. Researchers suspect the vessel was en route from Asia Minor to Rome when a storm claimed it.

The shipwreck site was discovered by Symiote sponge divers in 1900 and salvaged under Greek government supervision in 1900-1901. Diver Elias Stadiatis, clad in a copper and brass helmet and heavy canvas suit, emerged from the sea in fear, mumbling about a "heap of dead naked people"—marble sculptures scattered across the seafloor at a depth of 45 meters.

In 1902, fragments of the Mechanism were noticed among unsorted bronze pieces from the wreck at the National Archaeological Museum in Athens. When the corroded mass was examined more closely, it revealed the intricate gearwork within.

Recent Archaeological Discoveries

The Antikythera wreck continues to yield secrets. During a 2024 expedition conducted between May 17 and June 20, researchers discovered substantial portions of the ship's hull, revealing wooden planks forming the outer shell with transverse reinforcements connected using copper pins and coated with a protective lead layer.

Most remarkably, excavations at a second area of interest yielded evidence of another wooden ship beneath its cargo, suggesting that multiple vessels may have wrecked at this treacherous location. The 2024 expedition recovered approximately 300 objects including 21 marble fragments, numerous hull elements, and over 200 pottery fragments.

The Mystery of Uniqueness

Bronze was a precious material in antiquity, which may explain why no other examples of such mechanisms have survived—when devices stopped working, they were likely melted down and the valuable material reused. This practical consideration suggests that similar astronomical calculators may have existed but were lost to recycling or remain undiscovered on Mediterranean seabeds.

The mechanism's sophistication, combined with historical references by Roman writers like Cicero to similar devices, suggests it was not wholly unique but rather the sole surviving representative of a lost tradition of Hellenistic precision engineering. The craftsmanship and theoretical knowledge embedded in its design hint at a workshop tradition that may have flourished on the island of Rhodes or in Syracuse, where the legendary Archimedes once worked.

The convergence of advanced astronomical knowledge, mathematical precision, and mechanical engineering in a single artifact from the second century BCE continues to challenge our assumptions about what was possible in the ancient world—and what other marvels might await discovery.

---

Sidebar: The Mathematical Genius Behind the Gears

Babylonian Foundations Meet Greek Innovation

The Antikythera Mechanism was a computational instrument for mathematical astronomy, incorporating cycles from Babylonian astronomy and the Greek flair for geometry. The device's sophistication rested on centuries of accumulated astronomical knowledge from Mesopotamia, refined and mechanized through Greek mathematical insight.

Ancient Babylonian astronomers had meticulously recorded the daily positions of celestial bodies on clay tablets, revealing that the Sun, Moon, and planets moved in repeating cycles. These astronomical cycles became the driving force behind predictive astronomy and provided the foundation for the mechanism's calculations.

Planetary Period Relations: The Core Challenge

In Babylonian astronomy, synodic cycles—the periodic reversals of planetary motion against the stars—formed the basis of planetary prediction using period relations such as 5 synodic cycles in 8 years for Venus, denoted as (5, 8). However, this simple relation proved highly inaccurate.

A period relation can be expressed as:

S synodic cycles = Y years

Where the accuracy depends on how closely S/Y approximates the true astronomical ratio.

In 2016, researcher Alexander Jones made an astonishing discovery in the mechanism's front-cover inscription: the numbers 462 in the Venus section and 442 in the Saturn section—figures that no previous research had suggested ancient astronomers knew. These represented far more accurate period relations than those found by the Babylonians: 289 synodic cycles in 462 years for Venus and 427 synodic cycles in 442 years for Saturn.

Venus: (289, 462) giving ratio 289/462 ≈ 0.6255 Saturn: (427, 442) giving ratio 427/442 ≈ 0.9661

The Parmenides Method: Combining Cycles

The ancient Greeks faced a critical dilemma: while they knew the accurate Babylonian period relation for Venus of (720, 1151), this was impossible to mechanize because 1,151 is a prime number, requiring a gear with 1,151 teeth. How did they derive the more practical yet highly accurate alternatives?

The UCL team discovered that ancient Greek craftsmen employed a mathematical method described by philosopher Parmenides of Elea (sixth to fifth century BCE) and reported by Plato for combining known period relations to derive better ones.

The Parmenides method works by finding rational approximations with smaller denominators. If you have two period relations (S₁, Y₁) and (S₂, Y₂), you can derive new relations by forming:

(S₁ + S₂, Y₁ + Y₂)

This mediant operation produces approximations that fall between the original ratios while using more manageable numbers.

Using this ancient technique, researchers not only explained how the Venus and Saturn cycles were derived but also recovered the cycles for all other planets where evidence was missing. The factors 7 and 17 were cleverly used for more than one planet, allowing gears to be shared among different gear trains.

Gear Train Ratios

The mechanism's gears implemented these period relations through carefully calculated tooth counts. The gear ratio for any astronomical cycle can be expressed as:

Output rotation / Input rotation = (Product of driving gears) / (Product of driven gears)

For the Metonic cycle (19 solar years = 235 lunar months):

235/19 ≈ 12.368 lunations per year

This was mechanized through a gear train producing exactly this ratio.

Modeling Lunar Irregularity: Hipparchus's Theory in Bronze

Perhaps the mechanism's most sophisticated mathematical achievement was its treatment of the Moon's irregular motion. In the second century BCE, Hipparchus developed a theory to explain the Moon's irregularities caused by its elliptical orbit—though ancient Greeks didn't understand the orbit's actual shape.

Hipparchus described the Moon's variable motion using an epicyclic model:

θ(t) = ωₛᵢ·t + A·sin(ωₐ·t)

Where:

• θ(t) = angular position of the Moon
• ωₛᵢ = mean sidereal rotation rate
• ωₐ = anomalistic period (return to perigee)
• A = amplitude of anomaly (approximately 5-6.5°)

Researchers found a mechanical realization of Hipparchus's theory in the mechanism's gearing, revealing an unexpected degree of technical sophistication for the period. The Moon mechanism employed epicyclic gearing—gears mounted on other gears with slightly offset axes—combined with a pin-and-slot mechanism to model the Moon's variable speed as it traveled through the sky.

The epicyclic system worked by having gear e3 rotate at the rate of the line of apsides (ωₙ), while relative to e3, gear e5 rotated at -ωₐ (the anomalistic rate), ensuring the anomaly introduced by the pin-and-slot mechanism had the correct period.

The lunar position could be calculated as:

Relative angular speed = -ωₛᵢ - (-ωₙ) = -ωₛᵢ + ωₙ = -ωₐ

Where ωₙ = ωₛᵢ - ωₐ (the rate at which the Moon's apogee precesses)

Key Astronomical Cycles Encoded

The mechanism incorporated multiple overlapping cycles with precise mathematical relationships:

The Metonic Cycle: 19 years = 235 synodic months = 254 sidereal months

This produces the equation: 235/19 ≈ 12.368 = 254/19 - 1

The Callippic Cycle: 76 years = 4 × 19 years (Greek refinement)

The Saros Cycle: 223 synodic months ≈ 18.03 years ≈ 6,585.32 days

The Saros cycle works because: 223 synodic months ≈ 242 draconic months ≈ 239 anomalistic months

This triple near-equality ensures eclipses repeat with similar characteristics.

The Exeligmos Cycle: 3 × Saros = 669 months, which corrects the Saros cycle's 1/3-day error, predicting whether to add 0, 8, or 16 hours to eclipse times.

The Limits of Ancient Precision

While the mathematical models were sophisticated, the mechanism faced inherent limitations: hand-made triangular gear teeth, friction in bearing surfaces, and cumulative inaccuracies in the gear trains likely swamped the finer solar and lunar correction mechanisms built into it.

The accumulated error in a multi-gear train can be expressed as:

Total error ≈ √(ε₁² + ε₂² + ... + εₙ²)

Where εᵢ represents individual gear errors. The design conception exceeded the engineering precision of its manufacture by a wide margin.

The theoretical accuracy could not have been improved until around 160 CE when Ptolemy published his Almagest with the concept of the equant, and much later with Kepler's laws in 1609 and 1619. Nevertheless, the Antikythera Mechanism represented the pinnacle of ancient astronomical calculation—a machine that encoded sophisticated mathematical relationships in bronze gears, anticipating the computational revolution by more than two millennia.

---

Sources

1. Woan, G., & Bayley, J. (2024). An Improved Calendar Ring Hole-Count for the Antikythera Mechanism: A Fresh Analysis. The Horological Journal, July 2024. Available at: https://bhi.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/HJJuly24-AOTM-2.pdf

2. Freeth, T., Jones, A., Steele, J. M., & Bitsakis, Y. (2021). A Model of the Cosmos in the ancient Greek Antikythera Mechanism. Scientific Reports, 11, 5821. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84310-w

3. University of Glasgow. (2024, June 27). Gravitational wave researchers cast new light on Antikythera mechanism mystery. Phys.org. https://phys.org/news/2024-06-gravitational-antikythera-mechanism-mystery.html

4. Freeth, T. (2024). An Ancient Greek Astronomical Calculation Machine Reveals New Secrets. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/an-ancient-greek-astronomical-calculation-machine-reveals-new-secrets/

5. University College London. (2021, March 12). Experts recreate a mechanical Cosmos for the world's first computer. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2021/mar/experts-recreate-mechanical-cosmos-worlds-first-computer

6. Greek Ministry of Culture and Sport. (2024). Second Ship Found At the Antikythera Shipwreck! Breakthroughs in 2024. Ancient Origins. https://www.ancient-origins.net/artifacts-ancient-technology-news-history-archaeology/antikythera-shipwreck-2024-0021023

7. Szigety, E. G., & Arenas, G. F. (2025). The Impact of Triangular-Toothed Gears on the Functionality of the Antikythera Mechanism. arXiv preprint. Discussed at: https://www.ancient-origins.net/artifacts-ancient-technology-news-history-archaeology/antikythera-mechanism-0022033

8. Budiselic, C. (2024). By the Light of the Moon: A Lunar Calendar on the Antikythera Mechanism. British Horological Institute. https://bhi.co.uk/by-the-light-of-the-moon-a-lunar-calendar-on-the-antikythera-mechanism/

9. Freeth, T., & Jones, A. (2012). The Cosmos in the Antikythera Mechanism. ISAW Papers, 4. http://dlib.nyu.edu/awdl/isaw/isaw-papers/4/

10. Antikythera mechanism. (2025). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antikythera_mechanism