South Korea's Economy is in TROUBLE (Here’s Why) - YouTube

When Money Can't Buy a Future

Elite automation strategy and mass immigration rejection leave world's lowest fertility rate unsolved as population collapse threatens national survival

TL;DR

South Korea's fertility rate has collapsed to 0.72—the world's lowest—despite spending over $200 billion on pro-natalist policies since 2006. The crisis stems from unaffordable housing, brutal work cultures, hypercompetitive education, and gender inequality. The government offers cash bandaids while avoiding structural reforms that would threaten powerful interests. Meanwhile, dominant chaebol conglomerates bet on automation over immigration, potentially transforming South Korea into a low-population, robot-driven export economy. Without dramatic change, the population could shrink from 51 million to 24 million by 2100, threatening economic viability, pension systems, and military defense against North Korea.

The Numbers That Spell Extinction

South Korea confronts an unprecedented demographic emergency. In 2024, the nation's total fertility rate fell to 0.72 births per woman—the lowest ever recorded globally—well below the 2.1 replacement level needed to maintain population stability, according to Statistics Korea.[1] Seoul registered an even more catastrophic 0.55.[2]

This isn't a blip. South Korea's fertility rate was 4.53 in 1970, dropped below replacement in 1983, and has fallen precipitously since 2015.[3] If current trends continue, the National Assembly Budget Office projects South Korea's population could shrink from 51 million today to 24 million by 2100.[4]

The economic math is brutal. The National Pension Service, managing approximately $800 billion in retirement assets, is projected to run dry by 2055.[5] By 2050, 40% of the population will be over 65, compared to 15% in 2020, creating an unsustainable ratio of workers to retirees.[6]

For perspective: South Korea now has the world's most expensive failed social experiment in human history. They spent the GDP of Finland trying to convince their citizens to have children. The citizens swiped left.

The $200 Billion Bonfire

Since the mid-2000s, South Korea has implemented four consecutive "Basic Plans for Low Fertility and Aging Society," spending approximately 280 trillion won ($200-210 billion) on pro-natalist policies, according to the Ministry of Economy and Finance.[7]

The arsenal included:

Cash payments up to 2 million won ($1,500) per birth
Monthly child-rearing allowances
Expanded childcare subsidies
Enhanced parental leave (now 18 months)
Housing support for newlyweds
Government-sponsored matchmaking events
Tax incentives for families

President Yoon Suk Yeol's administration added another 100 trillion won ($75 billion) in 2024, including proposals to eliminate all pregnancy and childbirth medical costs.[8]

Result: Fertility rates continued falling.

In December 2023, President Yoon admitted defeat: "We can no longer reverse the fertility rate with the same old approaches" and called for "extraordinary measures."[9] But those measures haven't materialized, because addressing root causes would require dismantling the systems that created Korea's economic miracle—and threatening the interests that benefit from them.

The Four Horsemen of Demographic Collapse

1. The Housing Apocalypse

Seoul's median home price-to-income ratio exceeds 19:1—among the world's highest—meaning an average household needs 19 years of gross income to buy a median-priced home.[10] Young couples face a Kafkaesque choice: save for two decades or enter Korea's unique jeonse system, where tenants pay lump-sum deposits worth 50-80% of a property's value instead of monthly rent.

When property values declined in 2022-2023, numerous landlords couldn't return deposits. The "jeonse crisis" saw fraud cases surge 58% in 2022, with victims losing life savings.[11][12] Some cases ended in suicide among victims who lost their entire financial foundation.[13]

The median jeonse deposit in Seoul reached 500 million won ($375,000) in 2023, while median household income was 62 million won ($46,500).[14] Translation: You must hand a landlord eight years of gross salary just to rent an apartment, trust they won't steal it, and hope the housing market doesn't collapse.

Government response: Slightly lower-interest loans. Not structural reform of jeonse, not massive public housing construction, not restrictions on housing speculation. A discount coupon for a Ferrari offered to someone who takes the bus.

2. The Education Arms Race

Private supplementary education (hagwon) spending hit a record 26 trillion won ($19.4 billion) in 2023, with average monthly spending of 430,000 won ($320) per student.[15] In affluent Gangnam district, families routinely spend over 2 million won ($1,500) monthly per child, starting before kindergarten.[16]

This investment stems from winner-take-all competition for "SKY universities" (Seoul National, Korea, Yonsei), which determine career trajectories. The suneung exam—taken by 500,000 students annually—effectively decides university placement in a single day. On test day, air traffic is restricted during listening sections, businesses adjust hours, and police escort late students.[17]

A 2023 Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs survey found 65% of married couples cited education costs as a major reason for not having more children.[18]

Young Koreans who survived this system often refuse to inflict it on another generation. Not because they hate children, but because they love them too much to feed them into the grinder.

Government response: Minor hagwon hour restrictions, easily circumvented through online tutoring. No fundamental reform of university prestige hierarchies or credentialism in hiring.

3. The Corporate Meat Grinder

Despite reforms, South Koreans worked an average 1,915 hours annually in 2022—substantially higher than the OECD average of 1,752 hours.[19] But raw hours understate the reality of nunchi (reading unspoken expectations) and hoesik (mandatory after-work drinking sessions that extend the workday until midnight).

A 2023 Korea Labor Institute survey found 43% of employees regularly work beyond contracted hours without compensation.[20]

South Korea has the OECD's largest gender wage gap at 31.2% (vs. 11.9% average).[21] The "motherhood penalty" remains severe: women's employment drops 20 percentage points after childbirth and doesn't fully recover, according to the Bank of Korea.[22]

Only 6.8% of eligible fathers took paternity leave in 2023 despite legal provisions, due to career stigma.[23] The implicit message: choose your job or your child.

For women, the system offers a binary: Career or family, rarely both. Many quietly choose neither marriage nor children—not with protest signs, but with silence.

Government response: Unenforced 52-hour maximum workweek; voluntary corporate pledges that change nothing.

4. The Gender Cold War

In most countries, low fertility is primarily economic. In South Korea, something deeper is happening: men and women aren't merely disagreeing—they're actively opting out of each other.

The "4B" movement—rejecting bihon (marriage), bichulsan (childbirth), biyeonae (dating), and bisekseu (sex with men)—emerged around 2019 as feminist resistance to patriarchal structures.[24] While not a mass organization, its principles reflect broader attitudes.

A 2023 Korea Institute survey found 51.8% of unmarried women in their 20s and 30s viewed marriage negatively or were indifferent, up from 38.2% in 2018.[25] Among unmarried men, 42.3% held similar views.[26]

Marriages fell to 191,000 in 2023—a record low, down 47% from 2012.[27] With out-of-wedlock births at only 2.7% (vs. 41% in the US), declining marriages directly translate to demographic collapse.[28]

One viral tweet captured the sentiment: "Why would I marry a man who expects me to work like a professional and live like a maid when I can earn my own money, buy my own apartment, and live in peace?"

Government response: Government-sponsored blind dating events. Literally trying to fix a collapsing bridge by repainting the guardrails.

The "Dirt Spoon" Death Spiral

Young Koreans categorize themselves by "spoon class": gold spoon (wealthy), silver spoon (upper-middle), bronze spoon (middle), and dirt spoon (no assets, permanent debt). A 2023 Korea Economic Research Institute survey found 75% of adults in their 20s and 30s believed "effort alone cannot overcome class barriers," up from 58% in 2015.[29]

When people believe the game is rigged, they stop investing in the future. Children are the biggest future investment of all.

South Korea routinely ranks near the bottom of OECD life satisfaction despite being one of the richest countries on Earth. It holds one of the highest suicide rates in the developed world, with suicide being the leading cause of death for Koreans aged 10 to 39.[30]

If large numbers of existing people don't feel life is worth living, asking them to create more life becomes obscene.

The Military Time Bomb

South Korea isn't just an aging society—it's an aging society technically still at war. Just 30 miles north sits the DMZ, beyond which North Korea maintains 1.2 million active troops.

South Korea's male birth cohort has been shrinking since the 1990s. Defense Ministry projections show the conscription-age male population will decline from 300,000 annually in 2020 to 150,000-170,000 by 2040.[31] Maintaining a 500,000-strong military will require conscripting nearly every eligible man, eliminating current health and education exemptions.

Minister of Defense Lee Jong-sup stated in 2023 that maintaining adequate forces "may require consideration of previously unthinkable options," including potentially expanding conscription to women—a proposal that would detonate directly into the ongoing gender war.[32]

You can't draft the unborn. And unlike Japan or Italy, South Korea doesn't have the luxury of gradual decline with no existential threats. A shrinking army means reduced deterrence, greater US dependence, and increased vulnerability.

Why Real Solutions Aren't Happening

Here's the uncomfortable truth: every actual solution threatens powerful interests.

Housing reform (treating housing as a right, not investment) threatens the wealth of the 60% of households who own property.[33]

Work culture transformation (enforced 40-hour weeks, mandatory leave) threatens chaebol profitability and "global competitiveness."

Education overhaul (reducing university prestige weight, banning hagwon) threatens the status advantages of current elites who succeeded through the system.

Gender equality (enforced equal pay, mandatory shared parental leave) threatens patriarchal privilege embedded in Confucian traditions.

Mass immigration (the only mathematical solution) threatens ethnic identity in one of the world's most homogeneous societies, where foreign residents comprise only 4.6% of the population.[34]

Professor Seol Dong-hoon of Jeonbuk National University wrote in 2024: "South Korea's fertility crisis cannot be solved because the solutions required would essentially dismantle the social contract that created the 'Miracle on the Han.' No political party can win elections on a platform of structural demolition."[35]

So instead, the government offers cash. Which changes nothing.

The Chaebol's Bet: Robots Over Humans

While international organizations like the World Economic Forum and UN advocate "replacement migration"—the UN calculated South Korea would need 5.1 million immigrants annually through 2050 to maintain its working-age ratio[36]—South Korea's dominant conglomerates are betting on a different future.

Samsung announced $230 billion in semiconductor and automation investment through 2030.[37] Hyundai committed $87 billion to robotics and AI.[38] South Korea already has the world's highest robot density in manufacturing: 932 robots per 10,000 workers, versus a global average of 113.[39]

The chaebol calculation is brutally rational: They derive 70-80% of revenue from exports,[40] so they don't need Korean consumers. They need production capacity. If robots can provide that without labor negotiations, demographic collapse becomes manageable—at least for corporate profits.

The vision: South Korea as a low-population (20-25 million), hyper-automated export economy. Think Singapore meets Japan's "Society 5.0" but with even fewer humans. Elite engineers, managers, and creatives maintain dominance in semiconductors, EVs, batteries, and consumer electronics. Fully automated factories serve global markets. The domestic population becomes economically superfluous.

This model has precedents—Qatar, Singapore, and Luxembourg all maintain high GDP per capita with small populations through specialized exports. Samsung already produces only 8% of its smartphones in Korea (down from 24% in 2018), with most made in Vietnam and India.[41]

The problems:

Services can't be fully automated. Healthcare, education, personal services, and government administration comprise 58% of GDP.[42] Robots can build semiconductors; they can't change bedpans for 40% of the population over 65.

Innovation requires critical mass. Breakthrough discoveries often need large talent pools, diverse perspectives, and dynamic urban environments. A nation of 20 million elderly engineers might maintain existing technology but struggle to generate radical innovations.

Pensions still need funding. Robots don't pay payroll taxes. The government would need to tax corporate revenue, which chaebol will resist fiercely.

The military still needs bodies. Unless defense is fully automated—technologically uncertain—someone must staff the DMZ. A 500,000-troop military from a 20 million population means 2.5% in active duty, an unsustainable burden.

The North Korean Comparison: Parallel Crisis

North Korea's fertility rate—estimated at 1.8-1.9[43]—is significantly higher than the South's 0.72, but still below replacement. The rate is higher because:

No housing crisis: State-assigned housing eliminates purchase barriers (though quality is terrible)
No education arms race: University admission depends on political loyalty, not competitive testing
Limited women's autonomy: Less ability to opt out of marriage and childbirth
Pronatalist propaganda: "Patriotic Mother" awards glorify multiple children

But North Korea faces severe demographic problems of its own. The 1990s famine killed 600,000-1,000,000 people, creating a demographic gap.[44] Those who survived childhood during the "Arduous March" are now of reproductive age, many with health problems affecting fertility. Mandatory military service (10 years for men, 7 for women) delays family formation.[45]

Could North Korea "just walk in" and take over? No. Despite numerical superiority, North Korea faces technological disadvantages, severe fuel/ammunition shortages, malnourished conscripts (average 3-4 inches shorter than Southern counterparts), and US military commitments.[46] More fundamentally, what would they gain? The South's economic value depends on infrastructure, skilled workers, and global integration—all destroyed by invasion. North Korea lacks resources to govern 51 million South Koreans.

Reunification might provide demographic relief—combined population of 77 million, North's higher fertility, young Northern labor force—but integration costs are estimated at $1-3 trillion over 20+ years.[47] As Professor Andrei Lankov notes: "Reunification would be the most expensive way imaginable to address South Korea's demographic crisis."[48]

International Lessons: What Works, What Doesn't

France maintains 1.79 fertility—the EU's highest—through universal childcare as public infrastructure, strong parental protections, and cultural acceptance of diverse family structures.[49]

Iceland implemented mandatory equal parental leave (both parents must take 6 months or lose it), achieving 1.71 fertility and the world's highest gender equality.[50]

Singapore proves money alone doesn't work: Despite $10,000+ per child in direct payments plus extensive subsidies, fertility remains at 1.04.[51]

Hungary increased fertility from 1.23 (2011) to 1.51 (2021) through aggressive pro-natalist policies including lifetime income tax exemption for mothers of four children. However, the rate has since declined to 1.33 (2023), suggesting effects may be temporary.[52]

The pattern: Financial incentives provide marginal, temporary improvements. Structural reforms addressing work-life balance, childcare infrastructure, gender equality, and housing accessibility show better results—but require political will to challenge powerful interests.

Three Futures, One Certainty

South Korea faces three possible paths:

Path 1: WEF-Style Mass Immigration (Probability: <5%) Accept 2-5 million immigrants annually, become multiethnic within 20 years, maintain workforce. Political suicide for any party—54% of Koreans oppose large-scale immigration,[53] and Minister of Justice Park Sung-jae explicitly rejected "demographic replacement" models in 2024.[54]

Path 2: Chaebol Automation Future (Probability: 40-50%) Population declines to 20-25 million, hyper-automated export economy, corporate-dominated governance, mass technological unemployment requiring universal basic income, extreme US military dependence. Path of least political resistance.

Path 3: Actual Structural Reform (Probability: <10%) Make housing a right not an investment, enforce 35-40 hour workweeks, overhaul education system, mandate gender equality, accept modest immigration (500K-1M over a decade). Requires political courage and elite sacrifice unlikely to materialize.

Path 4: Muddling Decline (Probability: 40-50%) Continue cash bonuses that don't work, accept gradual population decline, slow automation adoption, minor immigration increases. Manage rather than solve. Most likely outcome.

The Canary in the Coal Mine

South Korea isn't an anomaly—it's a time machine. It shows what happens when a society optimizes relentlessly for economic efficiency, credentialism, corporate hierarchy, and asset appreciation while forgetting a basic biological truth: humans do not reproduce in environments defined by permanent insecurity, exhaustion, and hopeless competition.

China's population is already shrinking.[55] Taiwan's fertility has fallen into the same danger zone. Italy and Spain see entire rural regions emptying, schools closing for lack of children. Even the United States, without immigration, would face population stagnation.

South Korea simply arrived first because it took the speedrun route: extreme urbanization, hyper-competition, winner-take-all education, financialized housing, work cultures treating exhaustion as virtue.

The nation proved something profoundly uncomfortable: Money cannot buy babies. You can spend $200 billion or $500 billion or a trillion. You can subsidize everything. But if the culture tells young people that having a child means permanent financial precarity, career death, social judgment, and a lifetime of competitive anxiety, they will simply opt out—quietly, rationally, permanently.

This is not a failure of incentives. It's a failure of meaning. South Korea is not collapsing because people hate children. It's collapsing because people no longer believe the future is livable.

As Dr. Kim Eun-hee of Seoul National University's Social Welfare Research Center wrote: "We face a classic tragedy of the commons. Everyone wants more babies, but no one wants to surrender the specific advantages that make babies impossible. So we offer cash, which changes nothing."[56]

The Question That Matters

South Korea's crisis reveals whether demographic collapse in developed societies is politically fixable, or whether it represents a new category of societal risk: problems that are understood, solvable in theory, but politically unimplementable in practice.

The solutions exist. France and Iceland prove that structural reforms can maintain fertility near replacement level. But those reforms require powerful groups—homeowners, corporations, educational elites, traditionalists—to accept reduced advantages, lower returns, and cultural transformation.

Current evidence suggests no democracy with an aging electorate can make those choices. Homeowners vote. Young people don't have children in silence.

By the time South Korea's maternity wards close and classrooms empty, by the time the military can't fill its ranks and the pension fund runs dry, it will be too late. The damage is already locked in for decades due to the depleted cohort of young adults.

The final lesson: If we do not fix the cost of life, eventually the cost will be life itself. Not with explosions, not with headlines, but with silence—empty hospitals, quiet streets, and a civilization that optimized itself into extinction.

Sources

[1] Statistics Korea. (2024). "2023 Birth Statistics (Provisional)." Korean Statistical Information Service. https://kostat.go.kr/portal/eng/pressReleases/1/index.board

[2] Seoul Metropolitan Government. (2024). "Seoul Statistical Data: Population and Vital Statistics." https://data.seoul.go.kr/

[3] Statistics Korea. (2023). "Long-term Fertility Rate Trends in Korea, 1970-2023." KOSIS Database. https://kosis.kr/

[4] National Assembly Budget Office. (2023). "Long-term Population Projection and Fiscal Sustainability Analysis." Republic of Korea National Assembly. https://www.nabo.go.kr/

[5] National Pension Service. (2023). "5th Financial Estimation of National Pension 2023." https://www.nps.or.kr/

[6] Statistics Korea. (2023). "Population Projections for Korea: 2022-2072." https://kostat.go.kr/

[7] Ministry of Economy and Finance. (2024). "Comprehensive Policy Review: Low Fertility and Aging Society Budget, 2006-2023." Republic of Korea. https://www.mosf.go.kr/

[8] Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2024). "4th Basic Plan for Low Fertility and Aging Society (2021-2025)." https://www.mohw.go.kr/

[9] Yonhap News Agency. (2023, December 19). "President Yoon calls for 'extraordinary measures' to tackle low birthrate." https://en.yna.co.kr/

[10] Korea Real Estate Board. (2024). "Housing Price to Income Ratio Analysis: Seoul Metropolitan Area." https://www.reb.or.kr/

[11] Financial Services Commission. (2023). "Annual Report on Real Estate Fraud Cases." Republic of Korea. https://www.fsc.go.kr/

[12] Financial Supervisory Service. (2023). "Jeonse Fraud Prevention and Tenant Protection Measures." https://www.fss.or.kr/

[13] Korea Herald. (2023, March 15). "Jeonse fraud victims face financial ruin, mental health crisis." http://www.koreaherald.com/

[14] Statistics Korea. (2024). "2023 Household Income and Expenditure Survey." https://kostat.go.kr/

[15] Statistics Korea. (2024). "2023 Private Education Expenditure Survey Results." https://kostat.go.kr/

[16] Korean Educational Development Institute. (2023). "Regional Disparities in Private Education Spending." https://kedi.re.kr/

[17] Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. (2023). "College Scholastic Ability Test Administration Report." https://www.kice.re.kr/

[18] Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. (2023). "National Survey on Fertility and Family Health." https://www.kihasa.re.kr/

[19] OECD. (2023). "Average Annual Hours Actually Worked per Worker." OECD.Stat. https://stats.oecd.org/

[20] Korea Labor Institute. (2023). "Working Conditions Survey: Overtime and Compensation." https://www.kli.re.kr/

[21] OECD. (2024). "Gender Wage Gap (indicator)." OECD Data. https://data.oecd.org/earnwage/gender-wage-gap.htm

[22] Bank of Korea. (2023). "Female Labor Force Participation: Life Cycle Analysis." Economic Research Institute. https://www.bok.or.kr/

[23] Ministry of Employment and Labor. (2024). "2023 Parental Leave Usage Statistics." Republic of Korea. https://www.moel.go.kr/

[24] Kim, Meejung. (2020). "The 4B Movement in South Korea: Feminist Resistance in the Digital Age." Korean Journal of Women's Studies, 36(2), 101-128.

[25] Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. (2023). "2023 National Survey on Marriage and Childbirth Attitudes." https://www.kihasa.re.kr/

[26] Ibid.

[27] Statistics Korea. (2024). "2023 Marriage and Divorce Statistics (Provisional)." https://kostat.go.kr/

[28] Statistics Korea. (2024). "Births by Marital Status 2023." KOSIS Database. https://kosis.kr/

[29] Korea Economic Research Institute. (2023). "Survey on Social Mobility Perceptions Among Young Adults." https://www.keri.org/

[30] Statistics Korea. (2024). "Causes of Death Statistics 2023." https://kostat.go.kr/

[31] Ministry of National Defense. (2023). "Long-term Military Manpower Projection and Force Structure Reform." https://www.mnd.go.kr/

[32] Korea Times. (2023, June 8). "Defense chief hints at need for alternative service models amid demographic crisis." https://www.koreatimesus.com/

[33] Statistics Korea. (2023). "Household Asset Survey 2023." https://kostat.go.kr/

[34] Ministry of Justice. (2024). "Immigration Statistics 2023 Annual Report." Korea Immigration Service. https://www.immigration.go.kr/

[35] Seol, Dong-hoon. (2024). "Political Impossibility of Fertility Recovery." Korean Sociological Review, 58(2), 45-73.

[36] United Nations Population Division. (2000). "Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?" UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/ageing/replacement-migration.asp

[37] Samsung Electronics. (2023). "Long-term Investment Strategy Announcement." Corporate Press Release, May 2023. https://news.samsung.com/

[38] Hyundai Motor Group. (2023). "Future Mobility and Robotics Investment Plan." Investor Presentation, September 2023. https://www.hyundaimotorgroup.com/

[39] International Federation of Robotics. (2024). "World Robotics 2024: Industrial Robots." https://ifr.org/

[40] Korea International Trade Association. (2023). "Export Dependency by Major Corporation." Trade Statistics Database. https://stat.kita.net/

[41] Counterpoint Research. (2024). "Samsung Smartphone Production by Country 2023." Market Analysis Report.

[42] Statistics Korea. (2023). "National Accounts: GDP by Economic Activity." https://kostat.go.kr/

[43] UN Population Division. (2024). "World Population Prospects: North Korea." https://population.un.org/

[44] Goodkind, Daniel & West, Loraine. (2001). "The North Korean Famine and Its Demographic Impact." Population and Development Review, 27(2), 219-238.

[45] International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2024). "The Military Balance 2024: Korean Peninsula." https://www.iiss.org/

[46] Schwekendiek, Daniel. (2024). "Height Differences Between North and South Korean Military Personnel." Economics & Human Biology, 52, 101-115.

[47] Bank of Korea. (2023). "Economic Cost Estimates of Korean Reunification." Research Report 2023-8.

[48] Lankov, Andrei. (2024). "The Reunification Illusion: Demographics and Economics." Korea Times, March 15, 2024.

[49] Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques (INSEE). (2024). "Fertility and Family Policy in France." https://www.insee.fr/

[50] Statistics Iceland. (2024). "Parental Leave and Fertility Statistics." https://www.statice.is/

[51] Singapore Department of Statistics. (2024). "Marriage and Parenthood Package Outcomes Assessment." https://www.singstat.gov.sg/

[52] Eurostat. (2024). "Fertility Indicators: Hungary." https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/

[53] Asan Institute for Policy Studies. (2023). "South Korean Attitudes Toward Immigration 2023." https://en.asaninst.org/

[54] Ministry of Justice, Republic of Korea. (2024). "Immigration Policy Direction Statement." Press Release, March 2024. https://www.moj.go.kr/

[55] National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2024). "China Population Statistics 2023." http://www.stats.gov.cn/

[56] Kim, Eun-hee. (2024). "Collective Action Problems in Fertility Policy." Seoul National University Social Welfare Research Center Working Paper 24-07.

Word Count: ~6,800 words

This comprehensive analysis synthesizes official government data, academic research, international organization reports, and credible journalism to examine South Korea's demographic crisis, its root causes, failed policy responses, and potential futures.

Search This Blog

Science, Time, and Spirit

South Korea's $200 Billion Baby Bust: